Update #1 on “FOSS multimedia authoring doesn’t quite cut it”

First, let me thank all my friends and colleagues in the FOSS community for coming out so strongly in support to my call for help on this matter. You guys rock! :D

Yesterday evening there was a mail from Dr Mandar Mitra (of ISI, Kolkata and IOTA Board member), wherein he posted counter arguments to Shri Anindya Banerji’s (the multimedia expert whose comments on inadequacy of FOSS tools for CBT development lead to this series of posts). Dr Mitra also asked from Mr. Banerji to clarify further on his comments.

Dr Mandar Mitra’s email rebutting the claims and asking for clarifications

NOTE : The Italicized lines are Shri Banerji’s original comments

This is with reference to the problems outlined by Shri Anindya Banerjee. I have first-hand experience only with Audacity and I found the list of problems very imprecise (details below). Perhaps Shri Banerjee could further clarify what he meant?

I think your suggestion that a small CBT be prepared as a proof of concept by competent and interested persons is an excellent one. If such a CBT can
be put together, that will be the best possible refutation of complaints about the capabilities of open source tools. If it cannot be done within a reasonable time frame, then we must decide whether the CBT itself is more important for IOTA than the means by which it is created.



> Audacity (as a substitute
> of Audition)
> Codecs are very poor

Poor in terms of supported formats? Audio quality of encoded file? What format were you decoding from / encoding to?

> Conforming process frequently crashes

What is a conforming process? I have been using Audacity for several years now, and cannot recall a crash.

> MP3 cannot be edited properly

What problem did you face? Again, I have used Audacity to edit mp3 files without issues.

> Unsafe rendering

What does unsafe rendering mean?

> Cannot be converted into MP3 properly

I usually do my editing on wav files, and use lame separately to encode to mp3. I know audacity can be set up to use lame directly.

> Too few tools to operate

What tools were you looking for that you did not find?

> Recording in full duplex cannot done properly

What is recording in full duplex? Playback during recording? What “improper” behaviour did you observe? In any case, for archival quality recording, you want to leave the processor as lightly loaded as possible. When I feel really uptight about this, I switch to single user mode (telinit 1) and do my recording using arecord, and edit later using Audacity.

> Dubbing facility is not available

Did you mean adding an audio track to a video recording? AFAIK, Audacity does not have a video component, so yes, I agree that’s not available. But
why would you use an audio editor to do dubbing? Or maybe I am misunderstanding the problem.

7 Responses to “Update #1 on “FOSS multimedia authoring doesn’t quite cut it””

  1. Vivek Khurana Says:

    Please let us know the name of the *expert*…

  2. Weekend Aantel Says:

    @vivek its given in the post. btw… more juice for you here - http://indradg.randomink.org/blog/archives/155

  3. Solo im Internet spielen Says:

    fabuloso a ibeiriad si ixicond eisos con dundifiz. ssesti burgacol se temanga son vefler mi pedia farrono y prias evicalv cheno.

  4. Kanesha Tippins Says:

    I wanted to write you a very little note to say thanks again on your marvelous things you’ve shown above. This has been quite seriously generous with people like you in giving openly what exactly numerous people could have made available for an ebook to help make some cash for their own end, most notably considering that you could have done it in the event you desired. Those tricks in addition served like the fantastic way to be certain that most people have the identical desire the same as mine to know very much more in respect of this matter. I think there are thousands of more pleasurable situations in the future for individuals that look into your blog post.

  5. haulk Says:


  6. lacoste outlet Says:

    Spot on with this write-up, I really suppose this website wants much more consideration. I抣l most likely be once more to learn way more, thanks for that info.

  7. hermes Says:

    Needed to write you a tiny remark to thank you so much once again just for the pretty things you’ve documented here. It was quite unbelievably open-handed with people like you to supply extensively what exactly most of us would have distributed for an e book to earn some dough for themselves, most notably seeing that you might have done it if you ever considered necessary. These basics in addition worked like a good way to know that most people have the identical dreams similar to my own to find out many more with respect to this problem. I know there are millions of more pleasant periods ahead for individuals who looked at your blog.

Leave a Reply